What Agile taught me, and why nimbleness matters more in an AI era

September 17, 2025
·
4.5
min read
Kendra Cooke
Guest Author

What Agile taught me, and why nimbleness matters more in an AI era

September 17, 2025
·
4.5
min read
Kendra Cooke
Guest Author

Agile transformed how organizations built digital products, prioritizing speed, iteration, and learning. But in an AI-driven world, those same instincts can fall short. This article explores why nimbleness—not methodology—has become the critical mindset for responsible AI adoption and sustainable organizational change.

It's 2002, and my company is one of the early adopters ushering us into something brand new—“Agile training.” We didn’t realize we were gearing up for a total overhaul of how we built and delivered products. For the first time, we would be envisioning our products and solutions through a human-centered lens, with the promise of finally ending those infinite development cycles that rarely produced code ready for customers to use (or for us to learn from). Suddenly, our vocabulary exploded: stand-ups, scrums, champions, backlogs—an entirely new dialect for the language of work.

What Agile really taught me, though, wasn’t just a set of rituals. It was the shift in mindset to realize that real progress doesn’t come from a perfectly laid-out plan; it comes from putting real things into people’s hands and learning quickly from them. That shift was radical at the time and changed how I thought about building products.

Fast-forward 20 years, and we know Agile worked brilliantly for the digital era. It helped countless organizations accelerate transformation. But that acceleration was sometimes at the expense of thoughtful responsibility for the impact of our product choices (because we could change them quickly if they weren’t working for people). As we enter the age of accessible AI, I believe a different muscle is required.

Nimbleness ≠ Agile

Agile is now considered a methodology. Nimbleness is the new mindset. When it comes to AI adoption, organizations are facing a familiar tension, but with higher stakes. Large enterprises often have the upper hand early, with budgets, infrastructure, and greater access to compute. They can stand up AI pilots faster than anyone else. But those same strengths can become a drag as bureaucracy, entrenched processes, and governance layers slow the move from a promising prototype to something that scales for impact. Meanwhile, smaller and midsize companies, less resourced and less burdened, are freer to experiment boldly, integrate their learnings quickly, and scale pilots at speed.

It’s a bit like navigation. Agile is like traveling with a printed map: structured, linear, and reliable as long as the route doesn’t constantly change. Nimbleness is like using GPS in live traffic. You’re rerouting often, adjusting to conditions in real time, and making trade-offs along the way to reach the destination. In AI, this kind of dynamic adoption may separate pilots that stall from those that scale.

Without nimbleness—the mindset that builds trust, adapts quickly, and scales responsibly—size becomes drag, not advantage.

At SYPartners, we’ve recently conducted a survey that found 32% of leaders cite change management as their greatest AI/agent challenge. And according to research conducted by PwC, 42% of CEOs don’t believe their companies will be viable in 10 years without reinvention. The signals are becoming clear: in AI, scale isn’t enough. Without nimbleness—the mindset that builds trust, adapts quickly, and scales responsibly—size becomes drag, not advantage.

What nimbleness in an AI era looks like

At SYPartners, we’ve recently conducted a Future of Work Study that found 32% of leaders cite change management as their greatest AI/agent challenge. And according to research conducted by PwC, 42% of CEOs don’t believe their companies will be viable in 10 years without reinvention. The signals are becoming clear: in AI, scale isn’t enough. Without nimbleness—the mindset that builds trust, adapts quickly, and scales responsibly—size becomes drag, not advantage.

Here’s how that muscle could evolve:

  • From rapid iteration to rapid prototyping with purpose. Agile gave teams the advantage of shipping early, learning fast, and improving. That worked when the hard part of product development was building features. In the AI era, technical debt can fall away, lowering the barrier to build. The real opportunity—and test of nimbleness—is using that freedom to prototype with purpose, focusing less on mechanics and more on learning what truly creates value for customers.
  • From team alignment to collective alignment. Agile created alignment within product teams and their stakeholders, a huge advantage over the old waterfall model. Nimbleness requires whole-enterprise participation. AI touches every function, and success depends on everyone seeing themselves as co-owners, not bystanders. In practice, that means legal shaping responsible data use early, HR addressing employee fears, and operators testing workflows alongside technologists.
  • From scaling fast to scaling fast and responsibly. Agile taught us to value speed: ship early, get feedback, improve. That advantage doesn’t translate cleanly to AI, where risk compounds as fast as benefit. Nimbleness means scaling quickly and responsibly, with governance protocols, bias checks, and rituals that keep trust at the center of growth. That’s where growth gains have a chance to sustain instead of collapsing under reputational damage.

I’ve previously argued that AI requires all of us to be architects, not just users of technology. The distinction matters. Users consume what already exists; architects imagine and design what does not yet exist.

Nimbleness is the architect’s discipline in action. Just as great architects don’t stop at blueprints—they test materials, adjust constraints, and balance bold design with safety—leaders in the AI era must create conditions where collective experimentation, adoption, and responsible speed can thrive. The question is not simply, “Will you adopt AI?” It is this: Will you design for nimbleness, so your organization can truly architect its own future rather than inherit someone else’s?

What do you think?
Send us your thoughts to
momentum@sypartners.com
Kendra Cooke is Partner, User Experience, at SYPartners

More MOMENTUM